UPDATE: Johnston reports that the Social Security Administration now says its data were wrong and it has updated the numbers, which now show that the $50 million-a-Year Club did not boom in 2009 after all.
Its numbers fell and its members’ average income declined, rather than soared.
David Cay Johnston points out over at Tax.com that earnings for those making over $50 million a year exploded last year (in what was supposed to be a bad year for the rich), and takes the press to task for missing the story.
He’s right. It’s a good one.
Johnston takes a look at Social Security Administration data to find that:
The number of Americans making $50 million or more, the top income category in the data, fell from 131 in 2008 to 74 last year. But that’s only part of the story.
The average wage in this top category increased from $91.2 million in 2008 to an astonishing $518.8 million in 2009. That’s nearly $10 million in weekly pay!
The total income brought home by the over-$50 million club more than tripled from 2008 despite having fewer members. Those seventy-four people brought home more money than the bottom 19 million American workers combined, Johnston reports. And that doesn’t include income from interest, dividends, and capital gains, which is surely awe-inspiring for those seventy-four top earners.
Meanwhile, there were fewer Americans able to find work than there were in 2005, median wages dropped to $26,261, lower than a decade ago. As Johnston notes, half of American workers earn about $500 a week or less—and that’s pre-tax.
His conclusion:
What does this all mean? It is the latest, and in this case quite dramatic, evidence that our economic policies in Washington are undermining the nation as a whole.We have created a tax system that changes continually as politicians manipulate it to extract campaign donations. We have enabled ‘‘free trade’’ that is nothing of the sort, but rather tax-subsidized mechanisms that encourage American manufacturers to close their domestic factories, fire workers, and then use cheap labor in China for products they send right back to the United States. This has created enormous downward pressure on wages, and not just for factory workers.
Hear, hear!
Now it would be nice to see the mainstream press pick up this story. While we wait for that, you should go read the excellent series on inequality and its causes that Timothy Noah wrote at Slate last month.
What is wrong with making millions? Endowments of universities like Columbia thrive on successful people in business. More power to the earners and builders and less power to the envying statists.
#1 Posted by Mike Robbins, CJR on Tue 26 Oct 2010 at 04:59 PM
Mike, define "making."
#2 Posted by edward ericson jr., CJR on Wed 27 Oct 2010 at 05:09 PM
You might do well if you read the full article at tax.com where Johnson makes his point doubly not only in the body of the article but also in the comments section where he defends himself quite well against the usual ideologues who didn't read the article,either.
#3 Posted by dpjbro, CJR on Wed 27 Oct 2010 at 06:42 PM
@ Mike Robbin (and others of his ilk)
Where'd all you guys come from? Whoever you are - go away.
Strange, anti-voices keep popping up recently in comment threads. The comments seem astroturfed. The situation smells fish. Very fishy.
I get the sense that some FreedomWorks-like organization created a list of "liberal" sites to pester and this site was on the list. Its interns were told to go forth and gum up the works: comment threads and other places.
You expect me to believe that somebody in this thread is realistically going to support members of the $50,000,000+ club?
>> More power to the earners and builders and less power to the envying statists.
"Statists", um, really? Well, "Mike" give the Koch brothers my worst regards, k?
I wonder what "Mike Robbin" is a reference to. Hmm...
__________
Edit
Just before I posted this I googled Mike Robbin. He's some self-help guru. Well, I can't believe it's just one guy in the comment threads, but I've been wrong (many times) before. We'll see what happens in threads in the next few weeks or months.
#4 Posted by F. Murray Rumpelstiltskin, CJR on Wed 27 Oct 2010 at 11:46 PM