USA Today senior sports blog editor Chris Chase’s posts, covering the lighter side of sports culture, are typical fare; aggregated news with opinion and commentary. Yet they have acquired a rampant following, generating millions of pageviews and thousands of comments — most of which are about Chase himself rather than a given post. There are Facebook pages and Twitter accounts, at least two Tumblrs, and countless discussion forums dedicated to Chase. Only problem is, they’re all resoundingly negative.
Chris Chase may be the most hated blogger in America.
Chase, now 31, was an elementary school teacher when he started his sports blog in 2004.
“After working with third graders all day, my mind had turned to mush,” he says. The blog made for a nice diversion. By 2008, Yahoo was looking for temporary bloggers to cover the Beijing Olympics. Chase, then a swim coach who followed the sport closely anyway, “promised wall-to-wall Phelps coverage.” The blog was a success, and Chase’s temporary gig became permanent. In 2010, it became full time. Now he’s blogging for USA Today, as the newspaper with the second-highest print circulation in America continues to bulk up its digital-only offerings.
It’s hard to pinpoint exactly why Chase is so popularly unpopular. Chase himself doesn’t know. Sports fans are passionate, both in their love of and hatred for certain teams. As Deadspin’s Drew Magary pointed out in an article filled with some of his most vicious hate mail, they are not shy about expressing their opinions. One Bears fan even gave Magary the ultimate insult: “It’s so God-awful that it makes want to go out and read a Chris Chase ‘article’ and we all know he’s absolutely an abysmal ‘writer’.”
The hatred of Chase goes even beyond the sports world norm. My best guess is it’s a special combination of sports fans’ passionate relationships with their favorite teams and athletes, many of which Chase criticizes as part of his job; Yahoo’s huge reach and audience; the slightly-less-than-savvy Internet user who typically reads the site; and what people tend to expect from a sportswriter (accounts of games, breathless praise of athletic performances) versus what Chase actually writes about (Tim Tebow’s muscles, Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder’s new yacht).
“I think the hate started almost immediately,” Chase says, recalling an early article that cast doubt on the true age of Chinese gymnasts in the 2008 games. It garnered almost 6,000 comments. “Most of them were anti-me,” Chase says.
Once the comment section hatred got rolling, it didn’t stop. “Chris Chase is the Nickelback of sports writers. He is this polarizing force of terribleness that no one can get rid of,” wrote one Chase anti-fan. “That’s better than being the indie band no one’s ever heard of,” Chase replies, although: “I wish they had gone with something less obvious than Nickelback.”
The comparison is apt. Like Nickelback, it seems that no matter what Chase writes, it will be ripped to shreds. Some commenters post within seconds of the article going up. Chase wonders how many of his anti-fans sit at their computers watching their RSS feeds and waiting for his updates.
It makes sense, really. They’re devoted sports fans, and they’ve made hating Chris Chase into another sport. They even play on holidays — on Thanksgiving last year, Chase wrote about Detroit Lions defensive end Ndamukong Suh’s ejection for stomping on an opponent’s arm. Chase posted and went to eat Thanksgiving dinner with his family, during which he received emails from haters who hoped he choked on his turkey.
If the constant outpouring of truly vitriolic attacks—on everything from his writing to his looks, from commenters wishing that he’ll lose his job to commenters hoping he and his entire family will die and rot in hell—bothers Chase, he doesn’t show it. After four years of this, he’s able to take it all in stride (something he admits his mother has had a harder time doing). “As long as my bosses are happy with what is being produced, I tend not to care,” he says. Commenters have accused him of trolling them, writing things solely designed to inflame them and bump up pageviews. Chase denies this. “I don’t write for reaction,” he says, but “I know that if I write a post about Ben Roethlisberger and reference his sordid past, his fans are gonna come out of the woodwork.”
And Chase does take a few precautions to protect himself and his family from the haters. He keeps his Facebook account as private as possible. He password-protected his wedding website “just in case.” He avoids mentioning family or his personal life in his writing — Chase has chosen to put himself up for criticism; his loved ones did not. His friends, on the other hand (yes, haters, he has friends!) tend to enjoy scanning through comments on his articles, often sending Chase “the best ones.”
And to one of his haters’ biggest arguments that his stories are “inconsequential,” Chase points out that it’s his job to create that kind of “shareable, buzzy content,” — which is often what gets his employer the most hits. The article about Christina Aguilera’s national anthem mistake during the 2011 Super Bowl got 15 times as many comments as the coverage of the game itself. Yahoo’s most-shared and most-commented article on the London Olympics wasn’t about any of the events, but the taxes American medalists owe on their winnings.
Chase’s critics aren’t easy to track down for comment. Attempts to reach Bryant Burciaga, Web editor of the University of Colorado Denver’s student paper, the Advocate, were unsuccessful. Of the Advocate’s five most popular articles, two of them are about Chris Chase, who says the fact that anyone cares enough about his work one way or the other to write an article makes him happy. Burciaga wrote the most recent, “Chris Chase Fired!,” about Chase’s departure from Yahoo, and is one of the few to attach his real name to criticism of Chase (none of the Facebook communities, Twitter accounts, or Tumblrs I found had creator names or emails attached). Burciaga wrote:
After getting knee deep in the pile of cow manure Chase spits out for the week, you come to realize that everyone has a point. This man, cannot, for the life of him, write.
Yet Burciaga is guilty of the same careless reporting of which he has accused Chase. For Chase was not fired from Yahoo — he left the site after the 2012 Olympics for USA Today.
And Chase has his haters to thank for his new job. He’s pretty sure their engagement with his work was part of what made him an attractive hire. Those 5,500 people on Facebook who like the “Fire Chris Chase!” page keep coming back, don’t they? For all the grief Chase gets, he’s still thrilled to be able to share his opinions so many readers. In the beginning, he remembers being excited when his blog got 16 hits in a day. At Yahoo, he had millions. At USA Today, he says, “the hope is that some of the haters have followed.”
And maybe a few fans, too.

This article sounds like it was written by a defensive girlfriend, instead of simply writing that he is hated how about reading his articles and seeing for yourself 'why' he is hated.
#1 Posted by Jonathon Howard, CJR on Fri 14 Dec 2012 at 09:28 AM
people hate him for his yahoo articles which have great headlines that are very misleading but usually followed by a story with no substance and many factual errors. it's not only fans that hate him its also professional columnists who don't like him either because the normal reader can't tell the difference and yahoo columnists usually get the guilty by association bit I have had conversations with two yahoo writers and they try to separate themselves as far away from chase as possible. his page views are all because of his misleading headlines and advertisers and yahoo alike only care about page views and not accuracy or substance so that is why chase still has a job.
ps suh is a 3 technique defensive tackle not a defensive end just clarifying
#2 Posted by pat hunt, CJR on Fri 14 Dec 2012 at 10:35 AM
Can we hate you now, too?
#3 Posted by Dan, CJR on Fri 14 Dec 2012 at 10:36 AM
You suck, Chris Chase! (I haven't read this article, it just popped up in my Google alerts and this is my regular routine.) Boooo!
#4 Posted by Chris Chaser, CJR on Fri 14 Dec 2012 at 10:48 AM
Wait to neglect to point out the major critique of his work. It's factually incorrect. That is why he has so many haters and so many of them are apoplectic. This man gets the basic facts wrong at least as often as he gets them right. He spreads more misinformation than Fox News.
#5 Posted by Peter Martin, CJR on Fri 14 Dec 2012 at 11:35 AM
Chris Chase is just a terrible writer. I do read Yahoo Sports and I do not read USA Today, so his move makes me happy. It seems like he does zero research and has little passion for sports. You wonder who he knows that he keeps himself employed. He's like Rob Parker at ESPN without the whole race argument. Rob Parker asked the dumbest question in the history of a NFL Press Conferences in 2008, when he asked Lions coach Rod Marinelli if his daughter married wished she married a better defensive coordinator. Yet, ESPN decided to hire him. They got what they deserved with that awful hiring decision.
#6 Posted by Mike I, CJR on Fri 14 Dec 2012 at 11:56 AM
I love irony. The headline and the opening of this article are grammatically incorrect.
#7 Posted by Todd, CJR on Fri 14 Dec 2012 at 12:45 PM
Don't hate him. Just think he's a clown. He has no qualms about doing anything solely for the page views. He's not even remotely qualified to work for USA Today.
#8 Posted by Kenn, CJR on Fri 14 Dec 2012 at 12:58 PM
I could care less about Chris Chase, but what I love to read is how completely apoplectic his readers get. It makes me laugh how hateful they get. You can just imagine the foam coming out of their mouths as they wish death upon hiim. They say how they hate him, but the funny thing is, they read every single one of his articles from start to finish. Now who are the fools?
#9 Posted by Tony Baloney, CJR on Fri 14 Dec 2012 at 03:55 PM
Wow. This is the most Chris Chase-style article about Chris Chase I've ever read. It's a masterpiece of trolling.
Anyone who isn't brain damaged only has to read one article by Chris Chase to understand why he's so terrible. This person says it's because sports fans are "passionate." Not even Chris Chase could come up with a less accurate, less interesting explanation to fill out a luring headline.
Seriously, this article is like performance art. You've outdone the master. Bravo.
#10 Posted by MasterfullyDone, CJR on Fri 14 Dec 2012 at 05:04 PM
It's not only the useless topics he writes about. It's the endless grammatical errors and lazy fact checking that plague his posts.
#11 Posted by John , CJR on Fri 14 Dec 2012 at 05:18 PM
Wow, a pro-Chris Chase article!
Let me guess, "Sara Morrison" is just Chris in a dress. It's the only explanation for this.
#12 Posted by Rob Cypher, CJR on Sat 15 Dec 2012 at 07:15 AM
A two-page article and not ONCE is the quality of his writing mentioned? Yeah, people hate him because they're passionate about sports. That must be it, nothing to do with the terrible quality of his posts. Did you look at his work before writing this?
My personal favorite post was from this summer's Olympic coverage: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/olympics-fourth-place-medal/why-don-t-beach-volleyball-players-sand-over-175902480--oly.html
It appeared with this teaser: "There's a reason the billions of tiny particles cling to beachgoers but fall off Olympic athletes. Mystery solved >"
He uses 400 words in this article to go on about how you go to the beach and get sand on your legs, arms, neck, books, iPhone, car keys, brain, etc. before finally giving us the long-awaited answer in the penultimate paragraph. Behold the solution, in all it's brilliance:
"Why doesn't it stick? Because it's designed not to."
THAT'S IT! Mystery solved! No explanation necessary! If this were a 3rd-grade paper, it would get an F.
#13 Posted by Thom, CJR on Sat 15 Dec 2012 at 11:38 AM
Why would anyone listen to the internet's opinion on how to write? That's like asking a fish how to run a marathon.
#14 Posted by Rich, CJR on Mon 17 Dec 2012 at 02:39 PM
Defending the indefensible, and misleading the audience. Yep I smell Chris Chase all over this.
#15 Posted by Emil, CJR on Wed 19 Dec 2012 at 07:28 PM
Insanely funny! I never do this, but I got about two paragraphs into an article on USA Today's Ipad app only to stop, google the author, Chris Chase, and find this appropriate article (although seemingly written by Chris Chase himself) but more importantly the more accurately assessed comments sections. This guy is a tool. And not the type of tool that can actually write, like a pen, but something much worse. Think to yourself readers, the last time you got two paragraphs into an article, stopped, and were so dumbfounded by it's lunacy you had to look up the writer's credentials. Happened only once to me. Right now. I have long been a fan of USA Today, in part by the quality and standard of their journalistic integrity. A bar that has been far lowered (Mariana Trench style) in two paragraphs.
#16 Posted by Nick Knowles, CJR on Fri 28 Dec 2012 at 07:24 AM
I "was" a USA today subscriber for 6 years! Just the name chris chase, makes me want to vomit! I even left yahoo for a while because I just cant stand that idiot! He is like some crap on the bottom of your shoe that you just cant get off! The fact that USA today ONLY gave him a job because he carries so much negative following, turned me away! F em both!
#17 Posted by Shane Mac, CJR on Sun 6 Jan 2013 at 03:44 PM
Hey Sara of the CJR, here's a snippet of what pat hunt commented about Chris Chase's (lack of) writing: "people hate him for his yahoo articles which have great headlines that are very misleading but usually followed by a story with no substance and many factual errors." ... THAT is why people hate him, or, to be more specific, hate his writing. As a journalist myself, I find it disgusting that this is what passes for acceptable writing today. It has nothing to do with reporting, interviews, writing, depth, balance and fairness: In the scumbag world of Internet journalism, it's about page hits and comments. It's tabloid-ish trash like Yahoo! and sell-outs like USA Today that make the rest of us look bad. And as for you, you might as well become Chase's PR rep. Working for what supposedly is reputable agency, you took a perfectly good opportunity to explain everything that's wrong with Internet journalism and the idiot shot-callers who hire idiots like Chris Chase and turned it into a big joke instead. So pat hunt, a commenter, did it for you.
#18 Posted by Coach Bill, CJR on Mon 11 Feb 2013 at 03:23 PM