
In the last decade of his life, Joe Bageant came full circle. He and his third wife, Barbara, were renting a small, wooden house in Winchester, Virginia, the town where he grew up and from which he had fled repeatedly over the years—always returning, though never long enough to stay. In the late 1970s, he’d come back from Idaho for a while, after his father developed a bad heart, and moved into a mobile home in a poor part of town. During those years, Bageant worked as a reporter at the conservative local paper, the Winchester Star. He and a few friends had tried, and failed, to organize the reporters to join The Newspaper Guild; he quit soon after and moved West again.
Now, as he contemplated the onset of old age, Bageant was back in Winchester once more, gray-bearded, overweight, wearing determinedly unfashionable fishermen’s outfits, and hanging out with friends from a half-century earlier. He’d talk about everything from making raccoon stew to the state of the union. Underneath it all he was, almost obsessively, writing about and analyzing his poverty-stricken childhood, and contemplating the displacement of the rural poor by the rise of agribusiness and the post-World War II service economy.
Over many years—in articles, online essays, and, later, books—Bageant (pronounced “Bay-gent”) had been something of a lone voice, trying to convince his readers that America’s class divisions are as significant to the American story as its race divide; that the myth of American exceptionalism when it came to the absence of class is just that, a myth.
The sixty-four-year-old was a sort of Michael Moore character without the self-promotional gimmickry, remembering—perhaps romanticizing—a vanished world of hard, honest labor and damning the rise of an increasingly vulnerable underclass, numbering many tens of millions, among white, rural Americans and their displaced urban descendants. For these men and women, undereducated and underinformed, the community ecosystem upon which they had previously relied for sustenance no longer existed. The small-town and rural manufacturing and farming jobs they had once been able to count on had vanished; and the work that replaced those jobs, more often than not, paid abysmally and came with no benefits.
What Bageant wrote was, in many instances, offensive—but always brutally insightful. In America, attempts to describe working class culture frequently devolve into “blue collar” humor that celebrates parochialism and an ignorance of the larger world. Bageant saw the humor in his subject matter, but the laughter was always laced with tragedy. For him, blue collar ignorance was a product of, and a gateway to, exploitation. It was a symbol and a symptom of injustice. And he explored the political conditions of that injustice with an incandescent fury:
They are purposefully held in bondage by a local network of money families, bankers, developers, lawyers, and businesspeople in whose interests it is to have a cheap, unquestioning, and compliant labor force paying high rents and big medical bills. They invest in developing such a labor force by not investing in the education and quality of life for anyone but their own.
Working class Americans, Bageant wrote sardonically in his second and final book, Rainbow Pie: A Redneck Memoir, were “clubbed into submission long ago, and now require only enough medication for our high levels of cholesterol, enough alcohol to keep the sludge moving through our arteries, and a 24/7 mind-numbing spectacle of titties, tabloid TV, and terrorist dramas. Throw in a couple of new flavors of XXL edible thongs, and you’ve got a nation of drowsing hippos who will never notice that our country has been looted.”
Like Thomas Frank, the author of What’s the Matter with Kansas?, Bageant was preoccupied with the question of why millions of working class Americans have routinely voted against their economic self-interest over the past several decades. “Sometimes I think the gop emits a special pheromone that attracts fools and money,” he wrote in his first book, Deer Hunting with Jesus, published in 2007. How else to explain, he asked, the rise of an anti-tax, anti-government, hyper-conservatism among America’s white poor?

Excuse me … uncomfortable truths? Bageant does nothing but parrot the timeless progressive truism that conservatives are too dumb to see the world “as it really is” and always vote against their common interests. It’s typical left wing condescension for the lumpen. Nothing particularly thought provoking or original about that.
#1 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Tue 27 Sep 2011 at 10:30 AM
Nothing new here, just achingly mechanical interpretations of American complexities.
It would have been interesting if the 'Thomas Frank' question had been reversed - 'What's the Matter with Malibu/Martha's Vineyard/North Chicago?' Residents of these pleasant precincts, by the dogmatically left-wing interpretation of politics, also 'vote against their economic interests'. But the question seldom is asked in the MSM politico-journalistic echo chamber. I suppose the answer is that denizens are more . . . evolved . . . and they . . . think about the big picture and, well, really care about important cultural issues and saving the planet and so forth.
Uh-oh, wait a second. Where does this framing device take us regarding social 'class' in America? Fortuately, CJR and others will never ask the question that prompts the implicit, class-bigoted answer.
If CJR is really interested in being counter-intuitive, and exploring 'unpleasant truths' and so on, they could examine the literature that suggests that (1) affluent people are more socially 'liberal' than others, leading to (2) the paradox that economic liberalism is undercut by the social liberalism, since when you get down to it, economic outcomes depend more on 'culture' than on this or that monetary or fiscal policy. Don't want to mess with your worldview too much, there, CJR.
#2 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Tue 27 Sep 2011 at 04:58 PM
CJR seems to attract a disproportionate share of trolls, doesn't it?
It's easy to understand why folks like Mike and Mark want to discourage you from reading Joe Bageant's work. Sure, Joe enjoys ranting, but he actually knows the folks drinking at the Royal Lunch until they need a cab ride home in his home town, Winchester, Va. He can explain how the local power structure of realtors, developers, retailers, bankers and lawyers run things, supported by the right-wing Byrd family's local paper and the right-wing Lewis family's talk radio station. He watched how his father died penniless, and he watches Dottie singing Patsy Cline even when she can't afford to fill her prescriptions.
Mike and Mark don't want you to know about Dottie and her friends, because they really don't want progressives to make common cause with the white underclass. It wouldn't be in their interests.
#3 Posted by BillNRoc, CJR on Thu 29 Sep 2011 at 12:51 PM
To BIllNRoc, first off, I'd post under my own name before calling anyone a 'troll' - a 'troll' seems to be defined as 'someone who is besting a left-winger in an argument'. (Not unlike racist, sexist, homophobe, etc.)
Second, good luck on the dream of uniting the political cultures of Winchester, Virginia with those of Berkeley and Cambridge under one banner. Culture matters. If it didn't, then Manhattan, which has a mean value of about a million dollars for the average address. Maybe Barbara Ehrenreich will look into that in her next book, but I doubt it.
#4 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Sat 1 Oct 2011 at 05:47 PM
SO?
Why .. of course. The 30,000,000 illegals who have invaded the USA are deluded. They ought to return home and tell "The Economist" that the USA is a lousy place.
For every Mike Moore -- there 100,000 illegals that would be happy to live in his $5,000,000 Manhattan co-op. Yes, American capitalism is terrible.
LOL, ROTF.
#5 Posted by R.P., CJR on Tue 4 Oct 2011 at 08:22 PM
Read his blog and essays here: http://www.joebageant.com
#6 Posted by Ed Westfield Jr., CJR on Wed 5 Oct 2011 at 02:50 PM
I'm in the deep south, and Joe's people are my people, and I sometimes work at benefits for terminally sick kids without health insurance. Almost without exception their parents are voting against their own self-interests, voting for people who think their situation is their own fault for not trying hard enough. My people fuel the lotteries in their hope that some day they too might be millionaires, and they won't want to give any of it up when they get there – even though 65% of current millionaires say they wouldn't mind giving up more.
I miss the old right wing. It was no stranger to Christianity, and it didn't have to try so hard to justify itself.
#7 Posted by stephen broussard, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 10:22 AM