Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s credibility continues to dwindle—not a good thing, considering the markets and the economy need to believe someone’s got a handle on the crisis.
The New York Times alludes to that in so many words on page one, but Bloomberg comes right out and says it in its headline, “Paulson Credibility Takes Another Hit With Rescue-Plan Reversal.” (By the way, that’s one thing to really like about Bloomberg: Its headlines are often pretty aggressive.) The Journal continues to be more favorable toward Paulson, as is the Washington Post—notably, they got interviews.
Yesterday, Paulson said he wouldn’t actually buy any troubled assets with the $700 billion he was given for the Troubled Asset Relief Program. That sent the stock market into a tailspin and left everybody confused as to what will actually happen: He has some scheme to boost consumer lending, but the Times is skeptical about it, comparing it to the nasty structured-investment vehicles that helped boost subprime lending.
Here’s part of Bloomberg’s harsh—and rightly so—take:
“This is a flip-flop, but on the other hand, when they first proposed the thing, they didn’t really know what they were doing,” said Bill Fleckenstein, president of Fleckenstein Capital Inc. in Seattle and author of the book “Greenspan’s Bubbles.” Paulson has pushed some “cockamamie schemes,” he said. “So one has to ask, does he have any clue?”“This is not something he’s going to be proud to put on his resume,” said James Cox, a law professor at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, who has testified on securities regulation before Congress and served on legal advisory panels for the New York Stock Exchange and National Association of Securities Dealers. “It does tarnish Paulson’s image, because it shows that a lot of political capital was spent on something that most of us thought was not a good idea to begin with.”
Only history will render a final verdict on Paulson’s handling of this year’s cascading economic crises. But he surely couldn’t have wanted to spend his final days in office this way: spearheading the massive government intervention in the banking, insurance and mortgage industries; fielding requests to bail out automakers General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co., and Chrysler LLC, and even heating-oil retailers.
Paulson’s in an incredibly tough position, no doubt. But that’s no excuse for bouncing around like a pinball. The times call for steady leadership, to say the least.
Economic Crisis is the most controversial problem today not only in our country but also in the world. In this current economic situation, there needs to be some kind of viable way to repair credit lines and get the economy moving again. Treasury Secretary Paulson’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, doesn’t seem to cover enough. The FDIC’s chairperson, Sheila Bair, has set up her own strategy; a $24 billion plus plan for the 1.5 million homeowners facing foreclosure. Her idea is to give a stimulus of $1,000 to lenders for each renegotiated loan to owners in danger of heading to foreclosure. In the event of default, the FDIC will take on up to half of the burden. Paulson hates it, straight away, and proclaims that its just more spending that will lead to the bankruptcy of the FDIC. Some others view Bair’s actions as one of the first real attempts to help repair credit of the banking system and get cash flowing again. Click to read more on credit-repair/">Credit Repair.
Posted by Lisa P on Thu 20 Nov 2008 at 03:22 AM
All of us are affected of the huge financial crisis that our country is experiencing nowadays. It appears that a TARP was not enough to cover up the mortgage crisis. Endangered mortgage homeowners could not benefit from the kind of credit repair scores presented by Treasury Secretary Paulson’s Troubled Asset Relief Program. On the contrary, 1.5 million homeowners can obtain a sense of security when they’re facing foreclosure through the Federal Insurance Corp Chairman Sheila Bair’s new mortgage modification program. This straightforward system, a $24.4 billion program drawn from the $700 billion pool that TARP set up, will allow lenders a stipend of $1,000 per loan they renegotiate with financially stuck homeowners. In the event of default on a loan, the FDIC has pledged to take on up to 50 percent of the loss. While Paulson proclaims this as a mere spending that will only bankrupt the FDIC, many view Bair’s movement as a needed investment to maintain the liquidity in the mortgage industry. While this won’t solve all the problems immediately, it’s certainly a bold effort to help repair credit. Click to read more on Credit Repair
Posted by Personal Loans on Thu 20 Nov 2008 at 03:28 AM