Campaign Desk, The Kicker

A Pundit’s Hunch. Better Than a Poll!

By Liz Cox Barrett Wed 23 Apr 2008 08:24 AM 

• Print
• Email
• Comments
• Single page

Polls (polling data in the hands of cable pundits in particular) have earned a particularly bad name this election season.

So, what might be more credible or reliable than an actual poll? If not with a poll of a snapshot in time, how might we foretell the future? If not a poll, in what might we place our faith now?

A cable pundit’s hunch!

Tucker Carlson and Joe Scarborough on MSNBC this morning (emphasis mine):

CARLSON: We know that Bill Clinton, it’s a commonplace now, it’s conventional wisdom, has hurt his wife’s campaign. Nobody wants to hear this but I believe it’s true. I believe Barack Obama’s wife has hurt his campaign. I believe that. There is a widespread perception out there that she is an elitist even to a greater extent than he is and I bet if you polled on that, it’s true.

SCARBOROUGH: These are one of the things you’re not supposed to say on TV. I love Michelle Obama, I think she’s great but she gave a speech a week ago and she looked angry. I sat there and I was thinking that’s just not going to help Barack Obama. Mika [Brzezinski] said during the break, “Just be quiet. That’s not true.” And she thought there was something about race attached to what I was saying. Well, I said the same thing about Hillary Clinton in 1992…

I think [Michelle is] effective, too, at times, but I think also there’s a fine line the Obamas are walking right now, Tucker, on these elitist charges, again. People in central Pennsylvania, I don’t think — I don’t think they want to be talked down to by people that went to Princeton and Harvard.

CARLSON: I think if you polled that you would find it’s absolutely right. I don’t think it has to do with race. I think as popular as Michelle Obama is in the press I think she comes off as bitter to some voters.

I’ve seen plenty of pundits cherry pick polling data to try to support what they think to be true about a candidate, a primary, a group of voters, but, particularly given the blackeye that polls have earned this election season, does using a hypothetical poll to buttress what you “believe” really lend your opinion an air of authority?

CJR

Subscribe Today

Comments

JDS

Wed 23 Apr 2008 12:01 PM

You are exactly right. I have watched pundits for too long. I stopped this week. I realized it is getting worse, not better. Carlson and Scarborough are two of the most flagrantly ignorant. It is hard to believe that minds like theirs have a platform anywhere they can influence anyone.I am feeling lots better reading what was said and knowing I spared myself hearing it! Thanks for your commentary. Hopefully there are enough people who find them pointless that they will fade away.

Post a comment

We ask our readers to express opinions in a manner respectful to the readers and writers of CJR. Criticism of ideas is strongly encouraged, but personal, ad hominem attack will result in deletion of posted comments and, after one repeat violation, banning of the individual user. CJR reserves the right to edit or delete, for reasons of content, comments submitted to CJR. We also ask users to please keep posts to the topic at hand; those wandering far afield or appearing to be spam may be deleted. Please read the complete comment policy and full legal disclaimer.

 

Name: Email Address:

URL: Remember personal info?

Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)