Locals call it da kucha, or “big boxer shorts,” because of its shape. China Central Television’s future headquarters in Beijing is 54 stories, twin towers of glass and steel connected by an angular wedge at the top. Overlooking the Central Business District, it stands out in a city whose architecture is a mix of imperial grandeur, gray communist-era buildings, and dazzling modern construction. Da kucha will be a striking symbol of CCTV’s expanding budget and global ambition.
And of China’s other global media ambitions as well. Among other things, the government is building an English-language world service that will compete with BBC News—but with what is said to be 19 times the annual budget of BBC, currently the world’s largest news organization.
Having already achieved the status as the world’s second-largest national economy, China has decided that it also needs soft power, the ability to influence world public opinion to promote its commercial and foreign-policy interests. “To some degree, whoever owns the commanding heights of cultural development, and soft power, will enjoy a competitive edge internationally,” declared a communiqué that came out of the October 2011 plenary of the Communist Party’s Central Committee. Toward that end, the Chinese government allocated $8.7 billion in 2009-2010 alone to “external publicity work.”
The beneficiaries of this largesse are mostly the Big Four state-owned media corporations—CCTV, China Radio International (CRI), Xinhua news agency, and The China Daily newspaper and website. From inside da kucha and other news bureaus across the world, the Communist Party hopes to remake the negative image of China that it perceives in coverage by Western broadcasters. It hopes to replace the images of urban pollution, self-immolating Tibetan monks, and sweatshop workers with those of its rapidly growing cities and a prosperous new consumer class.
The makeover is already well under way. “This is Africa Live from CCTV News,” declared Beatrice Marshall, a CCTV anchor in Kenya, as she launched the network’s Nairobi broadcast center in January. This was followed in February by the launch of CCTV America, with headquarters in Washington, DC, and about 100 journalists and support staff hired so far across the Americas. CCTV America launched three new programs in February alone.
If you happen to switch on your radio in Galveston, TX, about 50 miles southeast of Houston, don’t be surprised to hear, “You are listening to China Radio International.” KGBC, a small AM station in Galveston, carries English-language programming by CRI, as do 13 stations in North America, including WILD in Boston and WNWR in Philadelphia. Around the world, CRI broadcasts in more than 60 languages, nearly double the number on the BBC World Service.
One of the world’s premier advertising spaces, an electronic billboard at 2 Times Square, also blinks a Chinese message. Last July, Xinhua, the government-owned news agency, leased a 40-by-60-foot LED sign there, a few months after it moved its North American headquarters from Queens to a tower on Broadway. Xinhua is already among the largest news agencies in the world, with more than 10,000 employees in 107 bureaus. In the developing world, especially, it competes on an equal footing with The Associated Press, Bloomberg News, and Reuters. Xinhua’s Web-based English-language TV unit, CNC World, plans to expand into 100 countries.
At a time when most Western news outlets face budget cuts and retrenchment, the Chinese are rapidly expanding their global media presence. Hillary Clinton told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in March 2010 that the US is losing the “information war” to new entrants like Al Jazeera and Russia Today—and CCTV.
In January, President Hu Jintao, writing in the Communist Party magazine Qiu Shi (“Seeking the Truth”), called on the Chinese to push back against Western cultural colonization: “The overall strength of Chinese culture and its international influence is not commensurate with China’s international status….International hostile forces are stepping up efforts to implement their strategies of westernizing and dividing China, with ideology and culture being key areas fields of their long-term infiltration.”

The simple truth is that once the government gets involved, it screws up. The problem with the Chinese media is that every item of information is ideologically loaded. There is no objective journalism to them means there is nothing to be believed. Everything is fabricated whether milk, pharmaceuticals or virginity. Why not information? Secondly, their modus operandi is that there is a image war for them to fight. The western media is negative. We have to counteract it, at any costs. it is worst than the Cold War. Thirdly, they think they have more money. They will win.
#1 Posted by Frankie Fook-lun Leung, CJR on Thu 24 May 2012 at 01:23 PM
(Western) "audiences who are used to journalists asking difficult questions of leaders".
Which audiences would those be? I have yet to see a Western leader asked "difficult questions" about substantive matters like WMD, assassintations, kidnappings, indefinite imprisonments without trial, or any of the endless lies they tell to get elected, for example.
"The kind of balance and nuance that Westerners associate with quality journalism"? Come, come. The 'quality journalism' must remain 'balanced' within the parameters laid down by their corporate, Capitalist employers, of course.
#2 Posted by Gantal, CJR on Thu 24 May 2012 at 10:54 PM
Clearly Gantal has not watched the BBC's Jeremy Paxman interrogate British politicians, or anyone else for that matter. It's brutal: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uwlsd8RAoqI
#3 Posted by Stefan, CJR on Fri 25 May 2012 at 09:21 AM
It's odd to describe CCTV, CRI, Xinhua and China Daily as "the Big Four state-owned media corporations" in China. The vital (but missing caveat) is that they are the Big Four in English, which has only elite influence. CCTV and CXinhua are obviously dominant, but CRI and China Daily are minnows by comparison. Many regional media organizations (e.g. Hunan TV/Golden Eagle Group, Shanghai Media Group) are far more influential in the Chinese market, and are also state-owned. And then there's Hong Kong's enormously popular and privately run TVB....
#4 Posted by SeekTruthFromFacts, CJR on Wed 22 Aug 2012 at 04:54 AM