The New York Times Magazine is out with a riveting story on the corruption at News Corporation’s News International division.
It’s a fascinating look at the depravity and cynicism of the British tabloid press and of the British government.
Scotland Yard failed abjectly to fully investigate what News of the World and others did by illegally breaking into people’s cellphone voicemail boxes—a failure the NYT ascribes to its desire to stay on good terms with the Murdoch paper. The agency decided not to even notify the vast majority of people it knew had been hacked.
Three plaintiffs are jointly seeking a judicial inquiry into Scotland Yard’s handling of the hacking case. The plaintiffs, who include a former deputy assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, say their rights were violated when the police failed to inform them that their names were found in Mulcaire’s documents. The former official, Brian Paddick, scoffed at Scotland Yard’s explanation that the appearance of his name didn’t necessarily mean that he was hacked. “It’s a mealy-mouthed way of saying, ‘We’re not telling you any more, that maybe something happened but we can’t be bothered to investigate,’ ” he said. A police spokesman said the department has been “as open as possible whilst maintaining and protecting individuals’ personal information and respecting privacy.” Andy Hayman, who ran the case for Scotland Yard, has since retired. He declined to comment for this article. He is currently a columnist for The Times of London, where he has written in defense of the police investigation and maintained there were “perhaps a handful” of hacking victims. The paper is owned by News International.
Rupert Murdoch has been paying off people left and right in the case—but usually with settlements, not outright payroll checks.
And talk about failing upward: The editor of News of the World, Andy Coulson, whom the Times reports surely knew about the illegal activity, is now press secretary for the prime minister, David Cameron. Stunning.
Go read the whole thing. It’s a fantastic piece of reporting and writing.
But I’ll leave you with the American connection here. Ladies and gentlemen: Les Hinton, CEO of Dow Jones, overseer of the august Wall Street Journal, who headed up News International while the hacking was in full force:
During testimony before the parliamentary committee in September 2009, Les Hinton, the former executive chairman of News International who now heads Dow Jones, said, “There was never any evidence delivered to me suggesting that the conduct of Clive Goodman spread beyond him.”
But interviews with more than a dozen former reporters and editors at News of the World present a different picture of the newsroom. They described a frantic, sometimes degrading atmosphere in which some reporters openly pursued hacking or other improper tactics to satisfy demanding editors. Andy Coulson, the top editor at the time, had imposed a hypercompetitive ethos, even by tabloid standards. One former reporter called it a “do whatever it takes” mentality. The reporter was one of two people who said Coulson was present during discussions about phone hacking…
Two months later, his former boss, Les Hinton, who was now running Dow Jones, testified by video-conference from New York. Hinton rejected suggestions by committee members that the payments made to Goodman and Mulcaire after their dismissals were intended to buy their silence. “I cannot actually see what silence there was left” after months of police investigation, said Hinton, who declined to comment for this article.
During a recent interview, the committee chairman reread portions of that testimony, pausing to laugh at Hinton’s repeated “I do not recall” or “I do not know” responses. “This was just a masterful performance by Les Hinton,” Whittingdale said. “We all sat in awe.”
— Further reading:
Journalism Scandal at News Corp.: Peek into a news culture overseen by Rupert Murdoch and Les Hinton.
Guardian’s Big Scoop on Scandal at News Corp. Tab: The story raises serious questions for the CEO of WSJ parent Dow Jones

Wow. Great story, thanks for finding it, Ryan. I would have missed that one.
Of course, here in America, that kind of secret phone tapping is legal, authorized by Congress in 2007 in the Protect America Act (PAA). Except it isn't Rupert Murdoch's clownish "reporters" tapping your phones, it is shadowy, secretive spooks from the National Security Agency (NSA). And the NSA spooks don't need to guess at people's PINs because AT&T gives them full, secret access to your phone records without telling you, contrary to the law and the 4th and 5th Amendment of the Constitution. And in 2008, Congress magnanimously bestowed immunity to AT&T and others for unlawfully handing over your phone records. And these shadowy government agents aren't looking for "tittle-tattle" (ha!) they are secretly tapping the phones of journalists and their sources, and other American citizens, looking for ....well, who knows what they are looking for? Maybe they *are* looking for celebrity tittle-tattle. All this with no warrants or judicial review.
Would you rather have Murdoch boys listening in on your phone messages, or shadowy government spies?
#1 Posted by James, CJR on Fri 3 Sep 2010 at 09:22 AM
BBC News states: Prescott may seek judicial review of phone hack claims.
That’s really ripe coming from Prescott, as it was under the now ‘Discredited David Blunket’s Directive’ that all Councils could Tap the UK phone lines so ‘Hack, Tap’ whatever you want to call it is an invasion of ‘Civil Rights’.
Does anyone honestly believe that any such information gained might not be used to sell to others?
Town hall bureaucrats have been caught snooping on private details held on a giant 'Big Brother' tax and benefits database. Link to cover story here > http://tinyurl.com/3y6nfc8
Remember the threat by UK Gov of £500,000 under the new powers for Data breaches?
So come on UK Gov start fining the ‘Town Hall Data Breacher’s’.
Come on Privacy regulator the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) do you darn.
Signed Carl Barron Chairman of agpcuk
#2 Posted by Carl Barron, CJR on Fri 3 Sep 2010 at 04:01 PM
Our government may allow CIA or FBI to tap into our phones but not the NY Times or any one else. Besides the CIA/FBI's use of our numbers are almost useless since they overloaded themselves with every phone and phone call made from Cheney's time on. It's almost impossible to sift through anything anyway. All the more reason for court oversight and limitations to who does what to whom. Since that time I know I'm listed there someplace since I subscribe on paper and online to newspapers from London that are highly "Marxist" or "socialistic" called the TLS and LRB which I find quite humorous.
I hope Murdock runs out of money with his illegal and fraudulent methods of gaining information--more gossip than factual. But he seems to like that kind of news more than the facts. They just get in his way. Mencken would have a hay day with Murdock and his WSJ and his Post let alone the London papers he owns and have turned into tabloids--even the Times of London. The TLS has been up for sale a few times but the subscribers in Britain and EU seem to be raising all kinds of
"cain" which makes him bring it off the market. It's the only part of the paper I find interesting and thorough in its information on books--of all sorts. This and LRB beat NY Times hands down in my view and go head to head with the NYRB. TLS keeps more politics out but I receive a different perspective on many of the same ideas and/or books and usually more thoroughly. I don't always agree with their conclusions--but that's half the fun of it--for me!! I hope Cameron and/or the Parliament take Scotland Yard to task and make them in return take Murdock to task for his sleazy actions blamed on the editors and journalist but initiated by him. London's journalists must make sure they keep their profession clean. If The Guardian is the only guardian for Britain--so be it!! It's a well-written liberal paper. Of course they go overboard or misstate a few things but who doesn't?? Guantanamo was much better reported through The Guardian than through the NY Times. I have some articles on paper to remind me and my grandchildren of what was done but should not have been. One paper is never sufficient. Go after Murdock!!
#3 Posted by Patricia Wilson, CJR on Sun 5 Sep 2010 at 07:55 PM
This article was Very helpful. Actually, I am fond of reading online punjabi news. Thanks for writing such a complete ..
thank you for sharing..
http://www.wwwuggsoutlet.co.uk UGG outlet
#4 Posted by xiaocheng, CJR on Fri 24 Dec 2010 at 12:13 AM
It really is one pair of very useful articles for me. I have been looking forward to this very nice of tiffany jewelry. Thank you for writing this article, I will not miss it. Thanks for sharing
#5 Posted by tiffany jewelry, CJR on Sat 19 Feb 2011 at 12:29 AM
Can I just say what a relief to find someone who actually knows what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More people need to read this and understand this side of the story. I cant believe youre not more popular because you definitely have the gift.
#6 Posted by kirklands coupons, CJR on Wed 14 Sep 2011 at 08:18 PM