The Kicker
Pitiful
By Dean Starkman Tue 26 Jun 2007 10:20 AMThis News Corp. statement speaks for itself. It comes near the beginning of the second day of The New York Times series on Rupert Murdoch’s company, and it tells business-press readers all they need to know about about why News Corp. will—not might— will ruin The Wall Street Journal:
“News Corp. has consistently cooperated with The New York Times in its coverage of the company. However, the agenda for this unprecedented series is so blatantly designed to further the Times’s commercial self interests — by undermining a direct competitor poised to become an even more formidable competitor — that it would be reckless of us to participate in their malicious assault. Ironically, The Times, by using its news pages to advance its own corporate business agenda, is doing the precise thing they accuse us of doing without any evidence.”
Read the Times series yourself. It’s great. But even if you don’t like it, to attribute bad faith to the newspaper is outrageous. For a marginal benefit, if any, Murdoch is willing to drag down reasonable discourse. This is the mark, and last refuge, of a scoundrel.
Memo from The Audit to the Dow Jones board and the Bancrofts: Don’t do it.
CJR
Subscribe Today
padikiller![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
Tue 26 Jun 2007 07:35 PMLOL...
Why does it not surpise me to find that the CJR "watchdogs" can't believe that the NYT's hit piece is an attempt to tank the Murdoch bid for the WSJ?...
The mere fact that Bill Keller rushed to do an "all hands", multi-bureau "investigative" piece right after he got wind of the WSJ deal is simply a coincidence, right?....
The Poor Old Gray Lady was just trying to educate its readers with its trademark, unbiased quality reporting and that damned Murdoch Bastard is nothing more than a paranoid freak!...