So there’s a tide of severed human feet washing up on Pacific Northwestern shores, and it only merits a 300-word AP article? Scandal! Outrage! Can we all agree that the media’s top priority should be solving the Mystery Shoe Mystery? Can we at least get Brendan McCarthy on the case?
#Realtalk: This isn’t another ‘golden age’ for print - But it is one for media
Social media in smaller markets - How three social media managers deal with smaller markets and more local coverage.
A rally for laid-off Sun-Times photogs - A protest Thursday morning drew about 150 picketers to the newspaper’s headquarters
Reporting, or illegal hacking - Scripps reporters are accused of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Exchange Watch: California Dreaming - Low healthcare premiums on the West Coast were trumpeted as a big, good-news Obamacare story. But: “Compared to what?”
Rolling Stone remembers Michael Hastings, dead at 33
The bold journalist died in a car accident in Los Angeles
On the journalistic value of being “a dick”
Buzzfeed’s statement on the death of its reporter
The disappearance of ‘Sports of the Times’
CJR’s panel discussion on coverage of gay marriage
On the eve of two related SCOTUS decisions, how should journalists be covering the issue?
CJR's Guide to Online News Startups
Uptown Messenger – Hyperlocal news for a neighborhood in New Orleans
Who Owns What
The Business of Digital Journalism
A report from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism
Questions and exercises for journalism students.
Justin:
I haven't seen the AP article, but I have been wondering about just the question you posed. I occasionally hear blips about the case whenever a new foot is found, but nothing else.
Mind you, I don't live in the Pacific Northwest, and (forgive me if I'm wrong) I got the impression most of the finds have been on the British Columbia side of the border.
If true, is it possible we're seeing a U.S.-centric bias away from what some might see as an, essentially, Canadian story? If so, that would be a scandal, because this is certainly one of the greatest "what's going on/whodunnits" in quite some time.
On the other hand, is it also possible that reporters are being stymied by law enforcement that have little understanding of what's going on themselves that they are either a) not willing to let go of whatever information they do have, and/or b) don't want to appear like they don't have a clue.
That would also be a scandal on two counts: 1) law enforcement holding back on information that might help people protect themselves from who ever is doing these grisly things, and 2) the press not pushing harder to find and report on that information.
Even from way down here in South Carolina, I'm intrigued by the mystery ... and why there hasn't been more/better coverage of it.
Martin L. Cahn, Senior Editor
The Chronicle-Independent
Camden, South Carolina
Posted by Martin L. Cahn on Wed 6 Aug 2008 at 01:12 PM
You know, I mostly just posted this because it was so weird, but I really do think that the press has been particularly clubfooted here. I think I'll check with some Canadian papers and see if they're in step with this story. If not, it probably does arch back to police stonewalling or reportorial laziness. Either way, the point is that there have been lots of disembodied feet appearing on beaches out West, and nobody in the press can get a toehold on the story. Which is just bizarre.
Posted by Justin Peters on Wed 6 Aug 2008 at 05:13 PM
Justin -- you're funny (in a dark way) ... "nobody in the press can get a toehold on the story"?
Seriously, though, that is bizarre. Hopefully someone somewhere is paying attention.
Posted by Martin L. Cahn on Wed 6 Aug 2008 at 11:56 PM
As a resident of BC I can tell you that it has been well covered in the papers here (Vancouver Sun, Vancouver Province) and on the CBC. One case has been solved through DNA analysis tracing back to a missing person. The rest remain unsolved. However, police have been quite forthcoming on this mystery and have stated that the feet do not appear to have been severed artificially but instead it's the result of natural decomposition of a body in water along with predators such as crabs. Because the feet are in running shoes they stay "intact" and that's all that remains [sic].
Posted by Doug Alder on Thu 7 Aug 2008 at 07:44 AM
Doug:
I'm glad to hear the authorities are being forthcoming and that the press there is keeping tabs on the case.
But did I understand correctly -- the feet haven't been severed by somebody? What theories have the authorities put forward, then? Statistically speaking, it seems incredible that this number of feet would wash up like this, with running shoes still intact, in the same general geographic area and not have some artificial element to it.
Very, very interesting.
Posted by Martin L. Cahn on Fri 8 Aug 2008 at 10:33 PM
Another IPCC Chicken Little Fairy Tale Bites The Dust
It looks like Al Gore can keep his San Francisco bayside condo off the market for a while before he has to worry about the meltwater chasing uphill.
The science doesn't back up Sidall's inititial claims.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/21/sea-level-geoscience-retract-siddall
Ah well, back to the AGW storyboard....
Posted by padikiller on Sun 21 Feb 2010 at 08:43 PM