During a string of “boring, terrible” office jobs, Gabriel Delahaye started to regularly comment on Gawker’s articles. He wasn’t just doing this for fun. He had every intention of getting himself noticed: e-mailing tips to the editors and just making himself “a general nuisance.” He wanted to be a writer, and while he had a blog, he was trying to develop a presence on Gawker’s site. “It seemed like the only access point to that industry,” says Delahaye. “I didn’t understand how else to do it, so that was the route I took.”
It worked. After writing for his own site for three years, and commenting a lot, a friend of Delahaye was having lunch with one of the editors of Gawker. She was saying how she was going on vacation, and didn’t know who would fill in while she was gone. Since frequent commenter Delahaye was already on their radar, his friend brought up his name, and they had him do the fill-in gig. Now the senior editor for Videogum, a blog that is owned by Buzz Media, his commenting career has come full circle: he recently hired a few of Videogum’s more regular commenters to be guest editors while he went on vacation.
As the principal writer for the site, Delahaye had developed a following amongst his readers, and finding a writer from within the commenting community was a way to “keep people feeling positive about the site for the week that it was different.” He says that the people who post on Videogum are very supportive of each other, and seeing one of their fellow commenters move on to writing content makes them welcome the newbie to the job. “They cheer each other on,” says Delahaye.
When a site takes its comment section seriously, treating it as an integral part of the site rather than a nuisance, a site can stand to gain a lot—and not just in traffic numbers. Some sites regularly find contributors from the comment section, hiring them and even promoting them. A well written and informative comment can serve as proof of a person’s interest in a site and its content—a sort of audition, allowing a person to try out their ideas on other people. And for employers, particularly ones in a blog setting, mining the comments for possible hires is a way to find someone whose writing voice matches that of the site.
Left-leaning political blog Daily Kos embraces this idea fully, hiring almost exclusively from its comments section. Susan Gardner, the executive editor of the site, had been an editor of a community newspaper in her twenties, but took fifteen years off to raise her children. Once she had some more time, she started reading the site regularly, ultimately signing up to comment. She was soon writing what Daily Kos calls “Diaries,” which is a longer type of blog entry that lines the right hand side of the page, an option available to any commenter after a week. Soon her diary entries were being featured on the front page, and eventually she was chosen for a fellowship. She moved up from there, going from full time contributor to executive editor. “I was jazzed,” says Gardner. “To get paid to do what you do in your spare time is wonderful.” And while many people who go to Daily Kos realize that some people do get hired, for many contributors, it’s mostly about impressing the people who interact there frequently. “The bigger issue is reputational within the community,” says Gardner.

Great piece! It's regrettable that the only examples of news orgs doing this are Gawker, Daily Kos and other online-only, born on the web properties. I guess it shouldn't be a surprise though since hiring a commenter is an even bigger mental leap for a news organization than hiring a blogger; still exceedingly rare, Brian Stelter's example notwithstanding.
#1 Posted by Anna Tarkov, CJR on Thu 25 Aug 2011 at 11:04 AM
What an idiotic, phony trend. When does my first check from CJR arrive?
#2 Posted by Gary Warner, CJR on Thu 25 Aug 2011 at 11:40 AM
This article is a little misleading, in that it implies these commenters were plucked from total obscurity, when in most cases there was either some inside connection, or an established pathway to become a regular contributor (as with Daily Kos). The only truly authentic "anonymous commenter becomes contributor" example ends up being one where the person essentially conned his way into the fold via misrepresentation. Hm! But still, an inspirational piece for those of us with way too much spare time on our hands.
#3 Posted by Edward Sung, CJR on Thu 25 Aug 2011 at 04:09 PM
@ Edward: I appreciate you reading, but I have to quibble with you on the misleading part. I am specific about who was intentionally doing this to get a job, by both building connections and commenting frequently, and who was truly not expecting this outcome through their commenting, such as the Gawker examples. As far as The Daily Kos, while it is true that there is an established pathway to being a regular contributor, there is not an established pathway to being a paid contributor, as only a handful of them are paid to write for the site. Just wanted to clarify!
#4 Posted by Alysia Santo, CJR on Thu 25 Aug 2011 at 04:28 PM
I'm not sure I'd want to write for any site that will have me as a commenter. (h/t Groucho Marx)
#5 Posted by CRZ, CJR on Thu 25 Aug 2011 at 04:51 PM
It's amazing piece of info...!I think most of us who writes gets inspired at the idea...!
#6 Posted by Padmanabhan Bhaskaran, CJR on Fri 26 Aug 2011 at 01:11 AM
I found this particularly fascinating in that it mirrors my own experience. I was a pseudonymous commenter on one of The Atlantic's blogs. Its author asked me to guest-blog for a week last summer. And then The Atlantic made me a Correspondent.
I won't pretend the experience is typical, nor that it was part of a conscious strategy on the part of the magazine to scour its website for potential contributors. More typical are the bloggers they've brought on board in the last year or two. But I do think it fit within that broader effort, on the part of The Atlantic, to lure writers who had already mastered the online format and built loyal followings, and to build out their website by adding distinctive voices.
Self-publishing - by blog or comment section - lowers the barriers to entry. Instead of relying on artificial filters, it's easier for editors to judge writers by their content. And that's good for all concerned.
#7 Posted by Yoni Appelbaum, CJR on Fri 26 Aug 2011 at 08:17 AM
The Guardian's Comment is Free has done this for some time too.
#8 Posted by Nick, CJR on Sat 27 Aug 2011 at 04:05 AM
Yeah..
If you spend enough time typing things the proprietors like reading... You might end up as a paid sycophant..
Hurray...
#9 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sat 27 Aug 2011 at 07:26 PM