This is the sixth in a series of posts that discuss how possible changes in Social Security will affect the residents of Champaign-Urbana, Illinois. The entire series is archived here.
Jim Bean is just the sort of person Social Security is intended to help. He is also the sort of person at whom the controversial recommendations from the co-chairs of the president’s deficit commission take direct aim. For Bean, now age fifty, waiting until sixty-seven to retire will be a stretch—let alone sixty-eight or sixty-nine, which might become the new retirement ages if deficit commission co-chairs Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles have their way. Bean is a rigger—the person who climbs up to the ceiling in theaters and entertainment centers to hang the lights and the sound equipment, and do whatever else is needed to make a production work. He currently operates the spotlights.
“It’s an inherently dangerous thing to work 100 feet in the air,” he says. “Eventually I’m not going to be doing rigging. There will be a time by the time I am sixty that I won’t want to do it.” Or, if something goes wrong, he may not be able to do it. Given his work history, an early benefit from Social Security when he is sixty-two will be low, although he didn’t know how much it would be. If the retirement age is raised and the early retirement age does not go up as well, his early retirement benefit could be very low, a point that has not been discussed up to now. The Simpson-Bowles proposal suggests a hardship exemption for people who must take their benefits at age sixty-two. Who knows whether Bean would fall into that category?
Bean, a wiry man with lots of tattoos, says he likes his job, but it’s not full-time employment. When classes are in session at the University of Illinois, he works at the Krannert Center for the Performing Arts. He is busy when there are performances. But in his business there are dry spells, although when he works the hourly pay is good. Sometimes he can make $28.50 an hour, or as much as $32 if he gets jobs in places like St. Louis. “I don’t see my income rising above $20,000,” Bean told me. “I’m not in the local (union) and do miss out on some jobs.”
We talked about Social Security disability benefits, which he had heard of but didn’t understand. “Riggers don’t carry insurance,” he said. “In our job people don’t get hurt, they die. You know that when you go up.” Between jobs as a rigger, he works as a musician. He’s a lead singer in one band and plays guitar in another. He says he lives very frugally in a tiny apartment in Champaign and helps his daughters, ages twenty-two and twenty, when he has extra money. “My oldest daughter got straight As in junior college and is now attending the University of Illinois with financial aid,” he said. “That girl has done a lot and has as much support as I can give. She has done real well.”
Our conversation got around to health insurance and health care. It turned out that Bean had had lots of interaction with the health care system. His predicament was featured in The Wall Street Journal seven years ago, as part of a piece about the aggressive collection tactics of Champaign’s Carle Foundation Hospital. Bean was uninsured, as he is now, and attempted suicide. He said he blew a hole in his shoulder that required three surgeries at Carle Hospital in 1991, when he was despondent over the break-up of his marriage. Bills piled up, and the hospital sued him. He missed some court dates and hospital lawyers got a warrant for his arrest—a body attachment, the Journal called it. He briefly landed in jail until his brother bailed him out. When the story was published, Bean was making payments to the hospital, which had agreed to drop the interest charges on the bill. His current health plan, he says, is not to get sick.
- 1
- 2
I hope this is not the type of article you wish MSM would run. It's very sympathetic, but if the rest of the series is like this, it's pretty worthless. How about some context and facts about how many people who have manual labor jobs who can't work longer?
And no mention of the fact that the increase of one year in the retirement age doesn't occur under the commission leaders proposal until kids age 16 today reach retirement?
#1 Posted by Bob Griendling (NewsCommonsense.com), CJR on Thu 18 Nov 2010 at 02:13 PM
Wow, the Wall Street Journal seven years ago, and now Trudy Leiberman. This fellow gets a lot of voice. College town? . . . As usual, Trudy neglects to point out that, though Bean's income is modest, he must pay almost 8% (not counting his employer's constribution) in FICA taxes from dollar one - the most regressive tax there is - so that a lot of folks can tool around in their RVs. How about interviewing Social Security recipients who don't need it, but take it anyway? Branson, Mo., isn't that far from Champagne-Urbana.
#2 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Fri 19 Nov 2010 at 12:44 PM
"Social Security in the Heartland: Jim Bean
What Social Security means to real people"
two myths in one headline
first myth - there is a land that is the "heart" of america and it is the land that is not anywhere near the east, west or even southern coast of the country
second myth - "real" people live in the heartland, whereas "less real" people live in the eastern western and even southern coastal lands
metaphors are useful except when they are cliches
#3 Posted by jamzo, CJR on Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 08:50 AM
Thanks for your willingness to help other which is greatly appreciated. I'm 60+ years old and have about 11 months before i begin to collect my s/s benefits, I'm do to receive $1,653 monthly, I worked for 34+ years and now unable to fine work, I need to start collecting now this will be my only income. my question is if i start my benefits now how mush will i lose.
Thanks,Need to start my benefits now
#4 Posted by Nathniael Hunter, CJR on Sat 16 Apr 2011 at 11:06 AM